Standing Policy Committee on Transportation and Transit will be debating public bike share system tomorrow, Jan. 25
Jan. 24, 2012
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Bike Calgary and the Bike Calgary Advocacy Committee are favourably disposed to the implementation of a public bike share (PBS) system in Calgary, provided that safe, functional and efficient Centre City bicycle infrastructure precedes the mobilization phase of the PBS system. "We support the recommendation to direct Administration to return by June 2012 with a business model and funding strategy for a PBS system with the understanding that staff or financial resources allocated to infrastructure, ongoing maintenance, and bicycle programs will not be diverted", says Bike Calgary president Brent Clark.
The cycling advocates believe that through approval and funding of the Cycling Strategy, Council demonstrated its commitment to providing Calgarians with better access to sustainable transportation options so that the 59% of Calgarians who want to cycle more often have the opportunity to do so. According to Bike Calgary, approval by the Standing Policy Committee (SPC) on Transportation and Transit to investigate the operation and funding of a PBS program is a step further in this direction and reinforces Council's commitment to increase bicycle mode-share. The organization also states that a PBS system in Calgary would be a great complement to Calgary's expanding public transportation network and a convenient way for Calgary's "interested but concerned" population (identified in the Cycling Strategy) to take up cycling.
However, Clark stresses that well planned and constructed bicycle infrastructure, accompanied by a comprehensive education and promotion campaign, is the foundation for a safe and successful PBS program. Clark says: "If limitations to financial or staff resources prevent such infrastructure and promotions from being in place prior to PBS mobilization, Bike Calgary recommends Council delay the PBS program until the conditions are right to ensure success."
Media contact
Brent Clark, President Bike Calgary
connect@bikecalgary.org
Bike Calgary is Calgary's largest transportation cycling association with over 2000 members on its bikecalgary.org website. The Bike Calgary Advocacy Committee was formed as part of the Civic Camp engagement process, which successfully petitioned The City of Calgary Council to approve, and subsequently fund, the Calgary Cycling Strategy. It includes representatives from most of Calgary's cycling and active transportation organizations, including the Elbow Valley Cycle Club, the Bike Root Campus Bicycle Society of Calgary, the Good Life Community Bike Shop, Two Wheel View, and the Sustainable Alberta Association/Commuter Challenge.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Bike Share Letter to Mayor & City Council 2012-01-24.pdf | 415.05 KB |
Excellent position statement.
Thanks Brent and the rest of the gang at BC that worked to develop this postion. This frames the views of the wider cycling community in a clear and concise manner.
Chris
x2 Thanks BIkeCalgary!
x2
Thanks BIkeCalgary!
fully agree, thank you
fully agree, thank you
Follow the meeting on #yycbike
I will be at City Hall today to tweet about point the public bike share feasibility study (point 3.2 of the agenda) and read Bike Calgary's letter to the Aldermen and the Mayor. Follow me (@schauvette) on #yycbike around 10am and/or attend the SPC meeting at the Engineering Traditions room in the basement of Old City Hall.
Has anyone got the link to the live broadcast thing?
Well done
Clear, concise, and well thought out.
Not as snarky as that other guy.
I also agree with this
I also agree with this "limited support". My thoughts are that cycling infrastructure and awareness and eventually acceptance are of higher priority than a bike sharing system. Cyclists who already commute have their own bicycle and have it with them. I think a share bicycle system is great for tourists to the city, but just think what other uses the initial investment and annual operating costs could be put towards... - my 2 bits...
Letter to city council on
Letter to city council on bike share now attached.
Indirect benefits
I agree with comments above, but we should also remember that commuter cyclists will definitely benefit indirectly from having a bike share:
1) A bike share may introduce a lot of new people to cycling, and if they like it, they may become a commuter cyclist and bolster our ranks;
2) More cyclists of any type means more reason to lay down infrastructure and cycling programs;
3) More cyclists on the road increases our visibility and has been demonstrated to reduce collsiions and increase safety of ALL road users;
4) More commuter cyclists means less drain on expensive modes of transportation like transit or private automobile,
etc.
While I don't think it should be a priority until after we make Calgary bike-friendly, I do think the bikeshare would be a fantastic addition to Calgary that will have some substantive benefits for all of us, even if we might never use it!
2 articles on today's bike share debate at SPC
How Aldermen voted and what they voted on: http://blogs.calgaryherald.com/2012/01/25/how-they-voted-to-pursue-calga...
General coverage: http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/calgary/City+cycling+advocates+argue+b...
(NB: Not sure if we should open a new topic for this? Feel free to move it)
From the sun
And Rick Bell posted his meeting notes. Doesn't the sun have an editor?
http://www.calgarysun.com/2012/01/25/wheels-of-misfortune
One more
And yet another one from the Herald:
http://www.calgaryherald.com/travel/Bike+share+program+divides+city+hall/6053620/story.html
CBC Article
Here is another article from CBC on the bikeshare, and in it they quote Bike Calgary member Simon Schauvette (fixmtl) who attended the discussions at City Hall to represent our point of view (thanks Simon!).
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/story/2012/01/25/calgary-city-council-bike-share-transit.html
Changed my mind on this
When I read the Cycling Strategy I was of the opinion that the bike share was a "nice to have" and not somthing that I would use, however having been in Toronto this week and watched people in suits dashing across town on the bixies I think I've changed my mind. I would still use my normal bike for commuting, but I suspect that I would also use a bike share scheme for quick trips to meetings across town. I wouldn't use my commuter bike for those as I would be worried about it not being around when I come out from my meeting and also the need to change shoes (and perhaps clothes) in order to ride it.
I'm not saying that I would support it over other parts of the strategy, but I'm definitely not negative.
Yes, I am kinda' "with you" on that
I might use it for a quick blast to MEC or the Bike Shop or to buy clothes at Atmosphere, Sport Chek or Outdoor Approach or food at Safeway or Co-op or something else instead of going through the hassle of unlocking my bike and removing it from the bike locker.
Bike Share Trips Replacing Car Trips
In the bike share discussion at the SPC on Transportation and Transit, Ald. Keating brought out a McGill study which found that only 2% of Bixi trips replace private car trips. Just to set the record straight: the study in question was not a study of Bixi usage, but a survey intended to gauge the potential of bicycle-transit integration in Montreal. As such, the survey was aimed at transit users and cyclists. Among other things, it asked this constituency how they used Bixi, if at all. It is no surprise that if you ask non-drivers how they would have travelled had they not used bike share, the answer will overwhelmingly be: not by car. In fact, according to the survey's script, people who never use transit were not asked the questions about Bixi use at all. (The full study and the script is included in the lead author's MA thesis available here.)
Bike share systems that surveyed their users directly (and are hence much more likely to accurate report bike share users' behaviour) found much higher rates of bike trips replacing private car trips, e.g., 19% in Minneapolis, and even 43% in Denver.
Thanks Richard this is very
Thanks Richard this is very useful. I tweeted the link to Alderman Keating. Since I did not fully answer his question during the SPC meeting last week I am sure he will find this useful.